Main Score & Risk Matrix
Our review desk considers this broker unsuitable for most traders until transparent licensing, stronger compliance evidence, and clearer client-fund protections are demonstrated.
RICO shows critical safety concerns. Regulatory transparency is severely limited and the risk profile suggests traders should exercise extreme caution before engaging.
Our review desk considers this broker unsuitable for most traders until transparent licensing, stronger compliance evidence, and clearer client-fund protections are demonstrated.
RICO, officially known as XP Investimentos CCTVM S.A., is registered in Brazil and has been operational since 2011, accumulating over a decade of experience. The broker offers a variety of trading platforms including Profit Rico Trader and MetaTrader 5, with trading conditions that include a range of investment products such as fixed income and stock market investments. However, it operates without a valid forex trading license, raising concerns regarding its regulatory compliance.
The broker’s regulatory status is classified as unregulated, indicating a high potential risk for users. Consequently, RICO is generally considered less safe than its regulated counterparts, which could lead to legal and financial uncertainties for investors.
Market reputation for RICO reflects a mixed user experience. While some users appreciate the range of investment options and platform variety, there are common complaints about customer service responsiveness and withdrawal processes. Transparency issues have been noted, with a higher frequency of complaints than seen with regulated brokers, suggesting potential concerns for prospective clients.
RICO, officially known as XP Investimentos CCTVM S.A., does not provide information regarding the holding of client funds in independently regulated bank accounts or any specific rules concerning fund segregation. Clients should be aware that RICO operates without valid forex trading licenses, indicating high potential risks.
The maximum leverage offered by RICO is not specified in the available data. As RICO holds no regulated licenses, it is essential for clients to consider the leverage practices and their compliance with local regulatory requirements, particularly for retail and professional client classifications.
RICO, officially known as XP Investimentos CCTVM S.A., has a mixed reputation concerning withdrawal issues. Common complaints revolve around delays in processing withdrawals, with a noticeable proportion of users expressing dissatisfaction with customer service responsiveness. Credible sources of complaints include online trading forums and review platforms, where users frequently share their experiences. The broker’s handling of complaints appears inconsistent, often resulting in slow response times. There are indications of repetitive complaints regarding withdrawal processes, suggesting systemic issues. RICO has not received any regulatory penalties or warnings, but its unregulated status raises concerns about investor safety.
These are the highest-rated forex brokers registered in Brazil.
The following brokers represent the highest overall trust scores across all regions on our platform.
A1: RICO, officially known as XP Investimentos CCTVM S.A., operates without any valid forex trading license. Its unregulated status raises concerns about safety and compliance, making it generally considered less safe than regulated brokers.
A2: RICO has no regulated licenses and is classified as unregulated, indicating a high potential risk for users. This lack of regulation can lead to legal and financial uncertainties for investors.
A3: RICO does not provide specific information regarding the holding of client funds in independently regulated bank accounts or fund segregation. Clients should be aware of the risks associated with its unregulated status.
A4: RICO has a mixed reputation regarding withdrawals, with many users reporting delays in processing and dissatisfaction with customer service responsiveness. Common complaints suggest there may be systemic issues with their withdrawal processes.